- commit
- 69eeaf7daadf89a299e0793fe92765caf57e6ba1
- parent
- ed0b015e92df55a0ff28d086a0ed520f89a19036
- Author
- Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>
- Date
- 2024-02-10 08:55
tweak ai post
Diffstat
M | _content/posts/2024-02-04-7-thoughts-on-ai/index.md | 23 | ++++++++++++----------- |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/_content/posts/2024-02-04-7-thoughts-on-ai/index.md b/_content/posts/2024-02-04-7-thoughts-on-ai/index.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 1 1 ---2 -1 title: "7 thoughts ideas on AI"3 -1 date: 2024-02-24-1 2 title: "7 boring thoughts on AI" -1 3 date: 2024-02-04 4 4 tags: [code, philosophy] 5 5 --- 6 6 @@ -20,9 +20,10 @@ summarizing information are extremely important. 20 20 21 21 So AI is useful, but it is also deeply non-rational. Its whole point is that we 22 22 do not understand how it finds its answers and which kinds of biases are23 -1 involved. We see that the rational approach that defined modernity has failed,24 -1 but we do not yet have a framework to evaluate the non-rational approach. This25 -1 makes AI a prime example of post-modernity.-1 23 involved. We see that AI makes rapid progress in areas where the rational -1 24 approach that defined modernity has failed, but we do not yet have a framework -1 25 to evaluate that non-rational approach. This makes AI a prime example of -1 26 post-modernity. 26 27 27 28 ## 3. AI is stupid, but humans are stupid, too 28 29 @@ -66,10 +67,10 @@ This is a weird form of communication, but one we have adapted to. It is also 66 67 not the only one: 67 68 68 69 - Reading a book is also pretty weird if you think about it. It is a one-sided69 -1 discussion with a person that might already be dead. Still, some people have70 -1 deep discussions with the bible or something.71 -1 - Reports from people who have used a phone for the first time suggest that72 -1 talking to a disembodied voice is weird.-1 70 conversations with a person that might already be dead. Still, some people -1 71 have deep discussions with the bible or something. -1 72 - Reports from the early times of the telephone suggest that talking to a -1 73 disembodied voice of a far away person is weird. 73 74 - Even [talking in groups](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.032) is 74 75 weird. Humans have created formal systems to mediate who should speak next 75 76 and how much airtime everyone gets. Reactions to your statement only come @@ -95,8 +96,8 @@ commands.) 95 96 96 97 To me, fear of AI feels awfully similar to a general fear of the "other", 97 98 whether that "other" is *real* AI, an alien life form, or simply someone from a98 -1 different country. What reason would they have to attack us? Why should we even99 -1 make a distinction between "us" and "them"?-1 99 different country. Why should we fear them? What reason would they have to -1 100 attack us? Why should we even make a distinction between "us" and "them"? 100 101 101 102 I am not saying that we should be naive. But it's worth examining whether our 102 103 suspicions are rooted in valid concerns or if they stem from our tendency to