- commit
- 13c1be744cbdd4f9079afaa2a2911a477460b63d
- parent
- 6afe5c2670ea4113cc1622828910d5ae5b675fcb
- Author
- Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>
- Date
- 2023-09-14 14:32
analysis: better explain impact of exponents
Diffstat
| M | analysis.md | 14 | +++++++------- |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/analysis.md b/analysis.md
@@ -333,14 +333,14 @@ value in WCAG 2.x to 0.4 we would get results much closer to APCA. And if we 333 333 were to change the exponents in APCA to 1/3 we would get results much closer to 334 334 WCAG 2.x. 335 335 -1 336 Our vision adapts to the lighting conditions. In the dark, we are much better -1 337 at discerning dark colors. A lower exponent models these darker conditions. 336 338 The most complete (but also most complex) color appearance model currently337 -1 available is [CIECAM02](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIECAM02). Its definition338 -1 of lightness can be approximated as `100 * pow(Y, 0.42 * c * z)`, where `c` and339 -1 `z` are parameters that depend on the lighting conditions. The total exponent340 -1 can have values between 0.31 and 0.72.341 -1342 -1 Given that model, WCAG 2.x is on the lower (darker) end of possible exponents,343 -1 while APCA goes to the other (lighter) extreme.-1 339 available is [CIECAM02](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIECAM02). It uses -1 340 exponents between 0.31 and 0.72. Given that model, WCAG 2.x is on the lower -1 341 (darker) end of possible exponents, while APCA goes to the other (lighter) -1 342 extreme. Choosing the right parameters depends on which lighting conditions we -1 343 want to model, and that is ultimately a policy decision. 344 344 345 345 It seems reasonable to use a lower exponent for light-on-dark color pairs. 346 346 First, because the background color itself is often a significant part of the