apca-introduction

commit

6afe5c2670ea4113cc1622828910d5ae5b675fcb

parent

4977315fef452c9c9e1240f8a9f7cd9a348af350

Author

Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>

Date

2023-09-14 14:13

analysis: question breaking compaibility in conclusion

Diffstat

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/analysis.md b/analysis.md

@@ -556,11 +556,13 @@ flare value of 0.4. As far as I understand, this is not a realistic value for
  556   556 flare. So the physical interpretation might be incorrect. This would however
  557   557 explain why APCA reports lower contrast for darker colors.
  558   558 
  559    -1 So far I like many of the ideas of APCA, but I am concerned by the [lack of
  560    -1 publicly available evidence]. Then again, the new algorithm cannot really be
  561    -1 evaluated without first making some policy decisions, e.g. which viewing
  562    -1 conditions we are aiming for. I hope this analysis can support the community in
  563    -1 figuring out what questions need to be answered.
   -1   559 So far I like many of the ideas of APCA, but I am not convinced that they are a
   -1   560 significant enough improvement to justify breaking backwards compatibility. I
   -1   561 am also concerned by the [lack of publicly available evidence]. Then again, the
   -1   562 new algorithm cannot really be evaluated without first making some policy
   -1   563 decisions, e.g. which viewing conditions we are aiming for. I hope this
   -1   564 analysis can support the community in figuring out what questions need to be
   -1   565 answered.
  564   566 
  565   567 [Web Content Accessibility Guidelines]: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
  566   568 [sRGB color space]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRGB