- commit
- 4b68fbfbb7e09a9860cdb0f0d4266bc2e336c860
- parent
- 564d4662974baf9ec4a9b4236dd947bf29917c83
- Author
- Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>
- Date
- 2023-09-14 08:40
update post flow-relative: fix later mention of absolute positioning Fixup c77db103cb1a34acf4b4bbc0b54db0b5554d7556
Diffstat
M | _content/posts/2023-02-26-flow-relative-layout/index.md | 6 | +++--- |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/_content/posts/2023-02-26-flow-relative-layout/index.md b/_content/posts/2023-02-26-flow-relative-layout/index.md
@@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ physical directions, so it should be split into `margin-block: 1em` and 60 60 `margin-inline: 2em`. 61 61 62 62 If you do not need to support vertical writing modes, this will get your pretty63 -1 far. The only things you need to find workarounds for are `float` and64 -1 non-static positioning. Often you can replace them with flex or grid layout.65 -1 For the few remaining cases I actually still use my [simple script from-1 63 far. The only thing you need to find a workaround for is `float`. Often you can -1 64 replace it with flex or grid layout. For the few remaining cases I actually -1 65 still use my [simple script from 66 66 2016](http://tobib.spline.de/xi/posts/2016-06-04-rtl-css/#the-workaround). 67 67 68 68 Vertical writing modes are not quite there yet. If you need to support them you