blog

commit

4b68fbfbb7e09a9860cdb0f0d4266bc2e336c860

parent

564d4662974baf9ec4a9b4236dd947bf29917c83

Author

Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>

Date

2023-09-14 08:40

update post flow-relative: fix later mention of absolute positioning

Fixup c77db103cb1a34acf4b4bbc0b54db0b5554d7556

Diffstat

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/_content/posts/2023-02-26-flow-relative-layout/index.md b/_content/posts/2023-02-26-flow-relative-layout/index.md

@@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ physical directions, so it should be split into `margin-block: 1em` and
   60    60 `margin-inline: 2em`.
   61    61 
   62    62 If you do not need to support vertical writing modes, this will get your pretty
   63    -1 far. The only things you need to find workarounds for are `float` and
   64    -1 non-static positioning. Often you can replace them with flex or grid layout.
   65    -1 For the few remaining cases I actually still use my [simple script from
   -1    63 far. The only thing you need to find a workaround for is `float`. Often you can
   -1    64 replace it with flex or grid layout. For the few remaining cases I actually
   -1    65 still use my [simple script from
   66    66 2016](http://tobib.spline.de/xi/posts/2016-06-04-rtl-css/#the-workaround).
   67    67 
   68    68 Vertical writing modes are not quite there yet. If you need to support them you