- commit
- b39fb7a6e86960226fd89a9767e1a083fbdff02b
- parent
- 1c287a27a741e821da34e56e432d1220058821b2
- Author
- Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>
- Date
- 2022-07-28 14:22
use coverage data from analysis tables
Diffstat
| M | README.md | 8 | ++++---- |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
@@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ function contrast(fg, bg) {
65 65 correspond to 45, 60, and 75 in APCA.
66 66 - Compared to WCAG 2.x, APCA reports drastically lower contrast for darker
67 67 colors. It also reports slightly higher contrast for lighter colors.
68 -1 - With WCAG 2.x, 29% of all color combinations have a contrast of at least 3,
69 -1 14% have at least 4.5, and 5% have at least 7. With APCA, only 23% of all
70 -1 color combinations have a contrast of at least 45, 11% have at least 60, and
71 -1 3% have at least 75. So APCA is stricter.
-1 68 - With WCAG 2.x, 27% of all color combinations have a contrast of at least 3,
-1 69 12% have at least 4.5, and 4% have at least 7. With APCA, only 21% of all
-1 70 color combinations have a contrast of at least 45, 8% have at least 60, and
-1 71 2% have at least 75. So APCA is stricter.
72 72
73 73 Also see my [detailed analysis](analysis.md).
74 74