- commit
- acdb62f96becd7115e9d0f0e921aaef56b01d026
- parent
- cfb081a78afb73ff1d1db5818e03016edb9cd5fe
- Author
- Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>
- Date
- 2022-07-17 05:08
exporess doubt about normalization artifacts
Diffstat
| M | analysis.md | 4 | +++- |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/analysis.md b/analysis.md
@@ -238,7 +238,9 @@ curves and this modified WCAG 2.x. 238 238 The APCA contrast formula is certainly not as obvious a choice as the one from 239 239 WCAG 2.x. I was not able to find much information on how it was derived. A 240 240 closer analysis reveals that it is actually not that different from WCAG 2.x,241 -1 but assumes much more ambient light.-1 241 but assumes much more ambient light. More research is needed to determine if -1 242 this higher ambient light value is significant or just an artifact of the -1 243 conversion I did. 242 244 243 245 ## Spatial frequency 244 246